Cryptocurrency payments are increasingly common in online gambling, yet licensed European casinos remain reluctant to introduce them. Research published by Kasinohai on 30 July 2026 examined 2,554 casino brands across 24 markets. Its findings reveal a striking difference between nationally regulated operators and casinos accepting customers without local licences.
According to the study, 1,283 casinos, representing 50.2% of the sample, advertised at least one cryptocurrency payment option. Bitcoin appeared at 98.2% of crypto-accepting brands, followed by Ethereum at 83.6%. However, these figures describe advertised payment availability rather than actual deposits or transaction volumes.
The licensing comparison was particularly revealing. None of the 319 nationally licensed casinos examined in Sweden, Romania, Italy and the Netherlands accepted cryptocurrency within their domestic markets. Germany recorded just two crypto-accepting operators among 41 locally licensed casinos, while 70.6% of brands without a German licence offered the payment method.
For players browsing an online casino, payment convenience is only one consideration. The nolimit online casino website illustrates the wider variety of casino-related information available online, including games and payment topics. Nevertheless, checking a casino’s licence and applicable payment conditions remains essential before depositing money.
National regulators require gambling companies to identify customers, monitor suspicious transactions and assess the origin of deposited funds. Cryptocurrency can complicate these procedures because identifying the person controlling a digital wallet does not necessarily establish where the money originally came from.
The UK Gambling Commission explicitly treats cryptoassets as a high-risk payment method. Operators considering cryptocurrency deposits must assess financial crime risks and notify the regulator about payment changes. These obligations create additional compliance work, even though cryptocurrency payments are not universally prohibited by gambling legislation.
The research also found that crypto acceptance increased from 30.6% among casinos launched in 2014–2016 to 70.9% among those launched in 2023–2026. Much of this growth came from newer offshore businesses rather than established European licence holders adopting digital currencies.

Cryptocurrency allows funds to move across borders without relying on conventional banking transfers. This can appeal to gambling businesses operating internationally, although transaction fees, currency fluctuations and irreversible payments introduce additional risks. Faster transfers do not automatically mean better consumer protection or more reliable withdrawals.
Tether emerged as another important finding. Its acceptance among newer offshore casinos reached 82.8%, compared with 21.8% among those established in 2014–2016. Unlike Bitcoin, USDT aims to maintain a stable dollar value, although this does not eliminate issuer, liquidity or redemption risks.
The study also identified differences in business structure. Crypto-accepting casinos had a median launch year of 2022, compared with 2018 for other casinos. These findings suggest that cryptocurrency growth is strongly associated with the arrival of newer operators rather than a widespread change in established licensing practices.
A casino accepting Bitcoin does not automatically operate illegally. Licensing rules vary between countries, and an overseas licence does not necessarily authorise a business to serve players in another jurisdiction. Customers should verify authorisation through their national gambling regulator’s official register.
Payment conditions deserve equal attention. Players should examine withdrawal requirements, identification procedures, transaction charges and whether cryptocurrency deposits can be refunded. Blockchain transfers are generally irreversible, making incorrect wallet addresses and disputes particularly difficult to resolve.
The 2026 findings demonstrate that cryptocurrency availability and national gambling regulation remain closely separated. However, the research cannot establish how much money casinos process through digital currencies or prove that licensing alone causes this difference. For players, verified authorisation, transparent payment rules and accessible complaint procedures remain more meaningful safeguards than the number of supported cryptocurrencies.